We will look at the time period from 1926 - 1999, to include the Great Depression and 1940-1999 to reflect a more normal period. It depends if you want a true worst case or a more normal environment.
Time Period 1926 - 1999
Investment/Min Return/Max Return/% Positive Return
Small Stocks/-52.71%/187.82%/65%
Large Stocks/-45.56%/54.56%/74%
Long Bonds/-8.74%/32.68%/74%
Short Bonds/-1.59%/14.95%/96%
Time Period 1940-1999
Investment/Min Return/Max Return/% Positive Return
Small Stocks/-40.54%/103.39%/67%
Large Stocks/-26.4%/52.55%/78%
Long Bonds/-8.74%/32.68%/70%
Short Bonds/-0.07%/14.95%/98%
What conclusions can we draw from this data:
- The minimum return data shows that short term bonds did the best during both time periods and during 1940-1999 only had a value of -0.07%. Small stocks which gave the best long term performance had the worst numbers at -52.71% and -40.54%. Bonds had lower negative numbers indicating that they provided more stability. Stocks that give the best long term performance had less stability.
- The maximum return data shows that stocks outperform bonds by a very wide margin. Small stocks that had the most negative minimum return value has the largest maximum value indicating the most volatility.
- The percentage of time that a positive return was achieved shows the investments had about the same value during both time periods. Short term bonds had the highest value at 96% & 98%. What is interesting and somewhat surprising is that small stocks, large stocks, and long bonds are very similar and about 2/3rds to 3/4ths of the time have a positive return.
- If you are concerned about losing money on your investment, a short term bond is the right answer, as it has the highest minimum return value and highest percent positive return.
- If you are investing in small stocks, large stocks, and long term bonds it is possible to lose money about 1/4th to 1/3rd of the time, the size of the loss is the least with long term bonds.
- If you are an aggressive investor that only has a focus on the maximum gain stocks outperformed bonds by a wide margin.
- Bottom Line: Stocks had the greatest potential for growth and the greatest risk in the amount of loss. Bonds had the least potential for growth and provided better stability.
If you have a child going to college next year and you are invested only in mutual funds that contain stocks, you need to consider selling some and invest in short term bonds to have some stability. Remember that the tuition payment is due when the tuition payment is due, regardless of what happens in the stock market.
No comments:
Post a Comment